This article was originally published by Jon Miltimore at The Foundation for Economic Freedom.
New research found that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than COVID-19 vaccines.
A newly published medical study found that infection from COVID-19 confers considerably longer-lasting and stronger protection against the Delta variant of the virus than vaccines.“The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,” the Scientific American reported Thursday. “The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.”
Put another way, vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity from COVID.
Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical. https://t.co/d14kTPnCWk
— Martin Kulldorff (@MartinKulldorff) August 27, 2021
The findings come as many governments around the world are demanding citizens acquire “vaccine passports” to travel. New York City, France, and the Canadian provinces of Quebec and British Columbia are among those who have recently embraced vaccine passports.
Meanwhile, Australia has floated the idea of making higher vaccination rates a condition of lifting its lockdown in jurisdictions, while President Joe Biden is considering making interstate travel unlawful for people who have not been vaccinated for COVID-19.
Vaccine passports are morally dubious for many reasons, not the least of which is that freedom of movement is a basic human right. However, vaccine passports become even more senseless in light of the new findings out of Israel and revelations from the CDC, some say.
Harvard Medical School professor Martin Kulldorff said research showing that natural immunity offers exponentially more protection than vaccines means vaccine passports are both unscientific and discriminatory since they disproportionately affect working-class individuals.
“Prior COVID disease (many working-class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical,” Kulldorff, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist, observed on Twitter.
Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical. https://t.co/d14kTPnCWk
— Martin Kulldorff (@MartinKulldorff) August 27, 2021
Nor is the study out of Israel a one-off. Media reports show that no fewer than 15 academic studies have found that natural immunity offers immense protection from COVID-19.
“Among the most fraudulent messages of the CDC's campaign of deceit is to force the vaccine on those with prior infection, who have a greater degree of protection against all versions of the virus than those with any of the vaccines.”
15 studies show…https://t.co/oXaI3L0Y3S
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) August 26, 2021
Moreover, CDC research shows that vaccinated individuals still get infected with COVID-19 and carry just as much of the virus in their throat and nasal passage as unvaccinated individuals
“High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus,” CDC Rochelle Director Walensky noted following a Cape Cod outbreak that included mostly vaccinated individuals.
These data suggest that vaccinated individuals are still spreading the virus much like unvaccinated individuals.
Vaccine passports would be immoral and a massive government overreach even in the absence of these findings. There is simply no historical parallel for governments attempting to restrict the movements of healthy people over a respiratory virus in this manner.
Yet the justification for vaccine passports becomes not just wrong but absurd in light of these new revelations.
People who have had COVID already have significantly more protection from the virus than people who’ve been vaccinated. Meanwhile, people who’ve not had COVID and choose to not get vaccinated may or may not be making an unwise decision. But if they are, they are principally putting only themselves at risk.
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
Speaking to author and podcaster Dana Parish, former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention...
The United States just made a decision that could lead to World War 3. The current ruling class...
Ukraine's Air Force Command claimed that Russia has, for the first time in the multi-year war,...
A top Ukrainian general told the troops that there is "almost no chance of survival" against the...
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
RIGHT TO TRAVEL
Kent v. Dulles 357 U.S. 116 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to travel is a part of the “liberty” of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.
I really doubt this will end the push for vaccine passports and serious restriction on those without them..
The covid agenda is political, not medical, and is the favorite agenda of the left so far as well as the most effective one to date.
No matter the issue being discussed, when politics walks in, truth walks out.
They, the so called “ruling clASS©” under orders from their masters, may be starting to change the narrative because they realize that the amount of people who are going to be vaxxed has peaked out, and the normal cold and flu season is soon if not already starting,which means that if what many scientist’s and medical researchers have been saying is true, then the great die off of the vaxxed is just around the corner. And when you factor into the equation the millions world wide that have had their eyes opened about what the agenda really is,we are in great danger because the “global elite©” have been caught with their knickers down. And they, may pull off a false flag to create some “order” out of chaos.
Who’s been saying the flu season will bring a great die off of the vaccinated?
Do some research,read it and weep
Freedom of movement IS NOT a fundamental human right. The only fundamental right you have is to be alive. After that, all of us live in a society which says what the rules are.
Want to drive? Get a license. Want to travel? Get a passport. Want to work as a porn star? Get an HIV test. Want to get married? Get a marriage certificate.
The government has every right to demand vaccination status. It is about protecting the vulnerable. We are not yet ( ?) Nazi Germany ??.
In the United States we live in a society where the government has only limited and specifically stated delegated legal authority to interfere with the people and anything outside of those limitations that the government does is illegal.
The right to travel is one of the rights retained by the people under the ninth amendment as well as the tenth amendment which includes the States as separate entities since it is not delegated to government authority in the Constitution.
Do you understand that?
For that matter, have you ever actually read and studied the Constitution to give you a basis for understanding it?
The State and it’s gov’t minions lie, lie, lie. Not merely give out false or wrong information (whether by omission or commission or degree) they intentionally and knowingly and purposely lie. It is actually State policy to lie, lying is a fundamental and crucial aspect to what is called statecraft. In officialdom there is no moral question attached to it, it is simply part of the process.
The State has an agenda independent of the American people, that agenda does not exist on behalf of the citizens, it is for the State. The people have no part in State goals other than merely serving as manipulated resources for the State to achieve its goals (don’t say we have the vote so the people decide what the State and gov’t does, look at what we’ve gotten for our votes – a absolute sh*tshow). Lying is necessary to achieve the goals in their agenda. That the State lies and exists solely for itself is the nature of the State. Nietzsche said “Everything the State says is a lie, everything it has it has stolen”. What this means is it cannot do otherwise. The concept of the State, regardless of its ideology, is the most oppressive, most inhumane, most destructive institution ever devised by man.