TRUMP SAYS: HUNTER MAKES FORTUNE FROM SHADY DEALS!
BIDEN FAMILY STINKS TO HIGH HEAVENS OF CORRUPTION!
DON'T GET LEFT OUT: HUNTER MUST BE STOPPED!
This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News under the title: Deep state neocon admits that Ukraine has “biological research facilities,” sets stage for false flag to be blamed on Russia
The powers that be are finally admitting that the United States is running biological weapons facilities in Ukraine that are among the likely targets of the Russian invasion. But as we have come to expect, the military-industrial complex talking heads are already preemptively blaming Russia for a potential impending false flag attack.
Neoconservative deep state hack Victoria Nuland, who holds the title of Undersecretary of State under Joe Biden, told Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and other members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the other day that the Pentagon does, in fact, own and operate bioweapons laboratories in Ukraine. The corporate-controlled media, as you probably noticed, had been saying that this claim is a wild “conspiracy theory.”
Nuland set the record straight, however, she also spun the narrative to imply that Russian President Vladimir Putin might be trying to take over these facilities in order to release their biological weapons as part of a large-scale attack on the West. Rubio pressed Nuland on this matter and got her to verbally agree to this narrative.
While it certainly could be the case that Putin is the madman that the deep state and its media propagandists want us to believe he is, it could also be the case that they are using him as a scapegoat for their own planned false flag attack. All they would have to do is launch one, blame it on Putin, and watch as the next phase of their agenda manifests.
“The U.S. has 336 labs in 30 countries under its control, including 26 in Ukraine alone,” announced the Chinese Foreign Ministry earlier this month.
Russia’s Foreign Ministry issued a similar statement:
“Russia obtained documents proving that Ukrainian biological laboratories located near Russian borders worked on development of components of biological weapons.”
According to Glenn Greenwald, formerly of The Intercept, Russia and China’s claims deserve the same level of skepticism as Nuland and Rubio’s claims. Remind us again what makes our own government any more trustworthy than those governments?
U.S. “fact-checkers,” Greenwald points out, reflexively defaulted to siding with the Pentagon (Pentagram) on this matter, accusing anyone who denies the official story of being a QAnon conspiracy theorist. But the evidence seems to point more towards wrongdoing by the military-industrial complex as opposed to the Kremlin.
“Nuland did something completely uncharacteristic for her, for neocons, and for senior U.S. foreign policy officials: for some reason, she told a version of the truth,” Greenwald points out.
“Her answer visibly stunned Rubio, who – as soon as he realized the damage she was doing to the U.S. messaging campaign by telling the truth – interrupted her and demanded that she instead affirm that if a biological attack were to occur, everyone should be ‘100% sure’ that it was Russia who did it. Grateful for the life raft, Nuland told Rubio he was right.”
Unfortunately for Rubio, who is not looking too healthy these days, the cat was already out of the bag. Nuland let it out that Ukraine does, in fact, possess “chemical or biological weapons” – you know, the same types that we were told justified an invasion and takeover of Iraq during the George W. Bush years.
“Nuland’s bizarre admission that ‘Ukraine has biological research facilities’ that are dangerous enough to warrant concern that they could fall into Russian hands ironically constituted more decisive evidence of the existence of such programs in Ukraine than what was offered in 2002 and 2003 to corroborate U.S. allegations about Saddam’s chemical and biological programs in Iraq,” Greenwald says.
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog. When one...
The United States Navy shot down its own F/A-18 fighter jet in a friendly fire incident over the...
The United States doubled its troop presence in Syria to 2,000 as the ruling class is determined...
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
Is this against any international law, or if the US is involved are there any American law being broken?
I find it hard to consider development of biological weapons, if that is what was being done, a totally legitimate pursuit.
Sort of. Technically there is a Biological Weapons Convention the US is signatory to.
Only ten states are not signatory to or have not ratified the BWC: Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Israel, Kiribati, Micronesia, Namibia, South Sudan, and Tuvalu)
The Pentagon facilities are used for dual purpose research; yes they are ‘studying’ deadly pathogensm but in the name of public safety and not officially weaponizing them.
They are essentially gaming the system. Most of the research in Ukraine is probably redundant and meant only to bait the Russians in. The potential for an ‘accident’ to happen is obviously quite high.
Obviously Russia was never going to let a nuclear and biologically armed Ukraine – essentially making Ukraine a version of Israel in Eastern Europe – on their doorstep.
Sort of. Technically there is a Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) the US is signatory to.
Only ten states are not signatory to or have ratified the BWC: Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Israel, Kiribati, Micronesia, Namibia, South Sudan, and Tuvalu)
Source: Biological Weapons Convention Signatories and States-Parties.
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/bwcsig
The Pentagon facilities are used for dual purpose research; yes they are ‘studying’ deadly pathogensm but in the name of public safety and not officially weaponizing them.
They are essentially gaming the system. Most of the research in Ukraine is probably redundant and meant only to bait the Russians in. The potential for an ‘accident’ to happen is obviously quite high.
Obviously Russia was never going to let a nuclear and biologically armed Ukraine – essentially making Ukraine an version of Israel in Eastern Europe – on their doorstep.
And by neocon you mean ziocon