Facebook announced on Tuesday that the social media giant will ban all ads encouraging people to avoid vaccination. Facebook is now censoring factual information on the adverse health and side effects of getting vaccinated.
Anyone paying attention knows that there will be a COVID-19 vaccine, and it will, for all intents and purposes, be mandated for all and distributed by the military. This is not news to most, however, the propaganda campaign has begun, and Facebook will assist the tyrants with censorship.
“Our goal is to help messages about the safety and efficacy of vaccines reach a broad group of people while prohibiting ads with misinformation that could harm public health efforts,” Facebook’s head of health initiatives, Kang-Xing Jin, said in a blog post, according to the Hill. “We don’t want these ads on our platform.”
The truth is, doctors and others have expressed concerns about vaccine safety, and this is not new. But the push to make sure everyone is vaccinated is new. So is the blatant censorship. As with other tightenings on free speech, enforcing the new ban on anti-vaccination ads will be crucial.
Trump: “The Military Is Ready To Deliver A Vaccine”
Facebook has chosen sides. They did a long time ago. They are not on the side of the people and will do what is necessary to see the elitists rollout the New World Order.
The military is still set to distribute a vaccine to all 324 million Americans and this censorship is part of the propaganda campaign pushed by Bill Gates to attempt to manipulate people into getting vaccinated.
Medical Journal: Get The COVID-19 Vaccine, Or Be Punished HARSHLY
According to the report by TheHill, Tuesday’s policy update will not affect user-generated content about vaccines, including the private Facebook groups and Instagram pages. So far, Facebook claims they will allow critics of vaccination the free speech that was already their birthright.
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog. The fact...
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog. When one...
This article was originally published by Willow Tohi at Natural News. A US Navy F/A-18 fighter...
This article was originally published by John W. Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead at The Rutherford...
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
From almost 10yrs prior…
This is Chief Justice John Roberts confirmation hearing, and then-Senator Joe Biden was questioning him on the “Micro-chip”. Senator Biden tells John Roberts:
“Can a microscopic tag be implanted in a person’s body to track his every movement? There’s actual discussion about that.You will rule on that, mark my words, before your tenure is over.”
Why doesn’t this come up, in the Supreme Court confirmation, when Project Warp Speed is rumored to modify Chromosome 8.
Apparently people cannot see the irony in the fact that people were outraged when Senator Nasse asked Amy Coney Barrett to list the five freedoms in the first amendment and Barrett replied: religion, speech, press, assembly, am I missing something?
Nasse replied redress or protests.
I really hate splitting hairs, but to petition the government with a redress of grievances, in my opinion is expressed in the rights to free speech, press, and assembly, and mob rule violent protests cannot be miscontrued as peaceful assembly, nor can they misconstrued for petioning the government with a list of grievances. and it is good the authors added it in, but the irony in all of this is that twitter users fail to see that those posing the questions have Assange in prison for exercising freedom of the press, which they claim is not covered for non citizens, even though they have censored people, including me.
Was this a psy-op?
https://sputniknews.com/us/202010141080772344-pure-insanity-netizens-up-in-arms-after-amy-coney-barrett-forgets-first-amendment-freedom/
Andrea Iravani
A certain number appear on the petition, before it must be ‘heard’.
Self-ownership is never among the grievances; a death star was put on there, before.