As the government seeks to regulate guns further and make it increasingly more expensive and cumbersome to legally own a gun, armed citizens spent the first month of 2019 proving weapons of any kind are basic human rights. Any regulation of a citizen’s defense weapon should be seen as a human rights violation: and their rights are being destroyed by their own government.
But many enjoy taking basic human rights away from others and won’t stop until we are all wholly enslaved to the political elites. Whether these people are useful idiots or misguided illogical immoral fools is really the only debate left. According to The Daily Signal, gun ownership surveys routinely find that about 1 in 3 American adults personally own firearms, meaning that tens of millions of law-abiding citizens regularly choose to exercise their Second Amendment rights. Recent surveys also indicate that 60 percent of these gun owners possess firearms primarily to protect themselves and others from crime.
A 2013 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention authorized by the Obama administration, in what proved to be a complete backfire for the anti-gun president, examined comprehensive studies of defensive gun use. It concluded that Americans use their firearms in defense of themselves or others between 500,000 and 3 million times every year. The report also noted that studies “have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies.”
But the whole reason the founding fathers wrote the second amendment down was to prevent any government from taking away the basic human right of self-defense, and that includes immoral acts committed by the government (like taxation or civil asset forfeiture, also known as theft). These are still immoral even if the government does them and a majority supports it. Individuals carry out these actions are responsible for the orders they follow.
https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/self-defense-is-a-basic-human-right-a-website-that-ends-the-gun-control-debate-for-good_03292018
For a few short stories about how Americans used their human right of self-defense to protect themselves or others in the month of January, read the Daily Signal’s article by clicking here.
The exercise of Second Amendment rights in defense of self or others is not a rare or extraordinary event, but a daily occurrence in the lives of ordinary Americans doing ordinary things. However, most don’t use it in defense of the government. But there could come a time when it is necessary. And that’s what makes it a basic human right. No one should ever be enslaved to the point that they have to die or be stolen from. We’ve already seen what can happen when Nazi’s take over and a nation succumbs to complete socialist rule. Not to mention how brutally bad the democide is when communism takes a hold.
https://www.shtfplan.com/alex-jones/democide-government-killed-over-260-million-in-the-20th-century-poised-to-kill-billions-more-in-the-21st_03162012
Democide (when governments kill the people they rule over): the largest killer of humans in history other than natural causes. Ignore all of the evidence, the facts, and the truth to your own detriment. History has a bad habit of repeating itself.
It Took 22 Years to Get to This Point
This article was originally published by Michael Snyder at The Economic Collapse Blog. When one...
The United States doubled its troop presence in Syria to 2,000 as the ruling class is determined...
This article was originally published by Lance D. Johnson at Natural News under the title:...
Commenting Policy:
Some comments on this web site are automatically moderated through our Spam protection systems. Please be patient if your comment isn’t immediately available. We’re not trying to censor you, the system just wants to make sure you’re not a robot posting random spam.
This website thrives because of its community. While we support lively debates and understand that people get excited, frustrated or angry at times, we ask that the conversation remain civil. Racism, to include any religious affiliation, will not be tolerated on this site, including the disparagement of people in the comments section.
Get armed with the Holy Spirit of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and the Creator of the Universe, before you “sell your cloak and buy a sword”, which you most definitely better do as our Lord commanded, but your pea shooters will DO YOU NO GOOD against the vile evil murderous genocidal monsters at the top of the United States CORPORATION Government Food Chain…for the vile criminal treasonous monsterous US Government evil you will need the FULL ARMOR OF GOD AND THE HOLY SPIRIT OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST!!!! Become SOVEREIGN, GET SAVED BY THE BLOOD OF THE LAMB, and sell your cloak and buy a sword-the fight for this lowest physical realm of earth is NOW UNDERWAY!!!!
Blood of any animal is a sacrifice, as ONLY demanded by SATAN…
Jesus never asks for that.
The lamb is Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. If you were actually saved you would know that, and you are correct Our Lord never asked for animal sacrifice, but he does ask for DEVOTION and FELLOWSHIP…Do you devote time and fellowship with our Lord DAILY Rodney???? if not I invite you too, then you will have more INSIGHT into who Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ actually is(hint-he is the final blood sacrifice as the lamb of God for the forgiveness of our sins).
??? What are you referring to? Jesus is the Lamb of GOD.
Leave us heathens alone, Ronnie. They need you at the 700 Club website.
I don’t care what any governmental laws are enacted, wether local, state or federal
they will all be ignored. I have one fundamental law that I will follow – its the 2nd amendment and it shall not be infringed.
We as a people need to push back hard against this liberal democratic socialism take over.
I really fear for my country and my Grandchildren
Jakartamaan: Ditto!
“Infringe” is not a very important word in law.
It has little substantial meaning and carries virtually no legal weight.
Not interested in “statutes”. Man has an inherent natural tight to defend himself and a firearm is one of those methods of self-defense.
What will carry weight is killing the bastards when they come to impose their tyranny upon you. I’m a very peaceable fellow until you come to my property with your storm troopers thinking you’re going to take anything from me. I have a surprise for you.
Many people say that sort f thing.
No one does it, particularly when looking down the barrels of many loaded guns.
A better strategy is needed.
comply when outnumbered. then when released find the politician/judge that enacted that law and visit him and HIS family with extreme prejudice!!!!
Absolutely right!!
Many people ain’t me.
So your “resistance” plan is to die.
Not much will be accomplished by that.
My plan is the exact opposite. You know not my situation, resources, or capabilities.
Menzo, “many people” ain’t me, either. No one wants to find out the “hard way” if they have any sense.
I was Airborne infantry for over 13 years.
Currently i attend training for pistol and rifle and compete in 3-gun.
Even I would not try armed defense against a breeching SWAT team, especially with women and children in my home.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9BPHQH-lIg
But to each his own.
I’m just saying,
The 8 man Flash Bang breech while you’re asleep in your underwear usually makes a believer out of the most resilient keyboard warrior.
Menzo, Mr. Bud, Wojo, and Jakartaman, the only set of rules I live by are the Bill Of Rights. Anything and everything that violates the Constitution is null and void so I don’t follow those. Our rights come from God and not any manmade government. Government has no business tampering with those rights. I still claim these rights regardless of what anyone says. I’ve also got some nasty surprises for anyone who comes to take anything from me.
If you have no rights.. all you have is wrongs..
Genius
Which other amendment would you be willing to infringe upon?
“Infringe” is not a very important word in law.
The US Constitution, every single word within that document, IS THE SUPREME LAW of this nation. Although the Bill of Rights lists those things that are NOT delegated to either the general(fed) or state governments, they are LAW that prevent those who serve within our governments any authority overthem (B of R)except as specifically written, and then ONLY in the ways also described in writing.
Ex: Dr. Edwin Vieira: “What are the defining characteristics of a limited government? They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do. Look at the First Amendment… What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion. But how does it do that? I quote: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press” etcetera. “Congress shall make no law;” that’s a statement of an absence of power. That’s a statement of a disability.”
The Amendment IV example: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
A careful review of the 4th Amendment tells us everything we need to know that those who serveithin our governments are any level that the people’s right against unreasonable searches and seizures SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED.
• Only REASONABLE searches and seizures are allowed and “reasonable searches” are defined within the 4th Amendment:
1. With a WARRANT;
2. Based upon PROBABLE CAUSE;
3. Subject to DUE PROCESS REVIEW (Oath or Affirmation);
4. Particularly describing the PLACE to be search, AND
5. Particularly describing the PERSONS or THINGS to be seized.
There is clearly a 5 point requirement as indicated by the word “AND”. You cannot have 4 out of 5 or 3 out of 5 and still have a reasonable search and seizure. That is the ONLY way that those who serve within our governments may search and seize anything LAWFULLY from the American people without committing felonies, Perjury, *terrorism (domestic), etc.
Section 802 (Title 18), “domestic terrorism” is defined as involving “acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;” which “appear to be intended–to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (or) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion”.
28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.
Well stated.
Democide is largely a communist strategy to execute dissenters, most notably in Communist China…
…the same place American soybeans are going.
Can you not perceive the cognative dissonance of arguing against tariffs which feed Chinese communists?
An ardent defender of natural rights should be an enemy to Chinese communists, right? After all, they are the largest group denying natural rights to their citizens.
So why would you argue against tariffs as the whole point is that trade should:
1. Be fair
2. Hurt our communist enemies whenever possible
3. Take the enemies wealth
Good prepper article on fire starting, etc. on Western Rifle Shooters Assn., today. And another one on digital censorship, just below it.
“BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS” is the perfect phrase to describe the BILL OF RIGHTS. Well done Mac Slavo. Why should the 105 lb. woman be less safe than the [6’10” 320 lb.] man? The 2nd Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, guarantees the small person may own an “equalizer” tool which we call a firearm. That same firearm makes it more difficult for TYRANNY to occur.
The other term you used that I liked was “DEMOCIDE”. Well done on a great article.
“Democracy is like two wolves and a sheep deciding what is for dinner! The 2ND AMENDMENT is where the “Sheep” is armed,thus equalizing the situation.”
JimS from Zerohedge
You’re showing us a gender (and probably, racial) minority, to exemplify basic human rights, knowing this is subversive.
You also participate in all kinds of social institutions, which can never be explained in terms of pure voluntaryism or a meritocracy. It never seems bizarre to a strident gun owner.
How do you know she is a racial minority? And why in the blue hell does it matter? A minority female shooting a gun might make you piss your sheets, but that is your problem!
“An ancient Roman method of execution for parental homicide involved a river, a sack, a viper, dog, rooster, and a snake. It was only carried out in rare circumstances for the punishment of parental homicide and (bizarrely) was even carried out in 18th-century Germany.”
v said, “And why in the blue hell does it matter?”
I assume that you’re asking me this question, as a neutral centrist, from inside of the mixed grab bag of incompatible worldviews.
v said, “that is your problem!”
Then, you see what is the problem, right?
Although I am civil and Cornucopian, there is still a competition for the most convenient resources, already available, in the here-and-now.
Maybe, maybe there will be enough, to go on forever.
Maybe, I am a gentleman.
Maybe, one of my competitors will shoot me.
I don’t get why people do handgun shooting at like 10 yards etc. I can point shoot at that range. I could blow someone to smithereens at 25 yards with any of my handguns. I used to shoot all the time 100 yards with my .357 blackhawk and .44 mag redhawk. 7.5 inch barrels. 25 yards (75 feet) should be the normal practicing distance for semi auto and short (4inch) barrel revolvers. WTF is with the low bar?
If your handgun can’t do that (or you can’t do it) then get a gun that will. I have shitcanned a lot of guns that I felt weren’t what I consider accurate. Trial and error. Most revolvers with a 4+ inch barrel will do it and same with most 4-5 inch barrel autos. I was popping baloons at 50 yards with a 4 inch barrel .357 freehand for christ sake. CCW you have to shoot 7 yards? Thats 21 feet! I could smack you in the head with a rock at that distance lol…
Do you believe that the Typhus carriers, in LA, are entitled to the same universal rights, as everyone else?
What if they have a piece of paper, and it gets a nice ink stamp, on there? Totally new category of human?
The Bible is the basis by which our laws came into existence, and the Isrealites of the Bible where the European Goyim. There are many references to the God given right to be armed. The Second Amendment reaffirms this God given right. The snakes, Cildren of Satan, those who say they are Iseael but do lie, are fighting in every way possible to rob God’s people of their God given right to bear arms, but the Bible says that Israel will never be disarmed; Isreal the issue (children) ra (rule) el (God). The word “Israel” denotes a people not a property, and the word means God’s Children rule with God. The USA is the Land of Milk and Honey with an Ocean on both sides with four sides square as prophesied. The white man was here before any other. The Seminole Indians of Florida were white. The original Cherokee Indian chief’s were also white. Leif Erickson, a white man, landed a ship from Europe four hundred years before Columbus. The white goyim are God’s Chosen People and they are Israel and will never be disarmed.
Research the facts. Learn who has been behind the movement to disarm the USA. It’s the oldest enemy of the Christian. They killed Christ. They kill Christians. They kill white people. They lie.
And they demonize and deride their victims. Christ volunteered to die by their hand, He was not defeated. These evil fools deceive everyone, even themselves.
.
hp says, “The Bible is the basis by which our laws came into existence.”
This is a degenerate form of the Athenian democracy, which used to employ sortition and timocracy.
Although common law is probably Christianity-themed, the state religion is closer to Hellenism.
Streets are named after their philosophers, who are the basis of our scientistic doctrines, such as elements, the atom, and evolution.
The formal mother tongues, of science and law are Greco Roman.
Our capitols are made in the fashion of temples and abstract, humanistic virtues — say, freedom and wisdom and medicine — are portrayed as idols of their gods.
You’re not really supposed to discuss it, outrightly, but it’s hardly been hidden, either. This is a scion of Greco Roman culture, not of Judaism.
The greatest civilization created toilet paper, indoor plumbing and deodorant.
Silly blinky, the Satanist PSYCHOPATH Sodomite Pedophile loving Americans did not invent any of that….ALL OF THOSE LUXURIES were around for the Satanist PSYCHOPATH Sodomite Pedophile loving Romans in the first millennium and earlier, but their water was not full of EDC chemicals, their toilet paper was reusable, and their deodorant was natural plant extracts not loaded with Aluminum designed to dumb you down and murder you slowly with breast cancer and other toxic metal horrors. In your case blinky, the deodorant is definitely working!!!! I was wondering what they were hitting you with, the deodorant you need from all the chemicals pouring out of your toxic body is really frying your brain and making you very ANGRY!!!
Hey escaped mental inmate, there were no paper mills in ancient Rome.
Life expectancy was much lower. Learn history, you zealous nutcase.
Vinegar sponge on a stick would probably have worked better, if it wasn’t shared between many people in public
re Defense Of Life, Liberty, And Property Are Basic Human Rights
Since WHEN has the ‘District Of Criminals’ been interested in ANY of THAT?
Try reading the NDAA – you’ll soon see that, according to the ‘District Of Criminals’, you don’t own a damn thing and have NO “rights”.
Met Judas Sunday:
I went to a craft show with my wife in SW Florida Sunday as I dislike football. A table was set up at the gate manned by what could most accurately be described as a “good old boy”, overweight, overalls, shaggy beard, white. He was getting a petition signed and forms filled out for mailing to put Banning Assault Weapons on the ballot as a Florida State Constitutional Amendment. His selling pitch was:
A. I own guns and I’m for this
B. People shouldn’t have machine guns.
Reasoning with him was impossible as I stated the FBI Uniform Crime Reports of 400 murders / yr with rifle of any type, the purpose of the Second Amendment and other issues such as NFA 34. He was both completely ignorant of anything presented to him and was a virtual tape recording to everyone in ear shot. He was getting a significant number of signatures.
Trouble is coming as the Democrat / Progressives have no other issue to wrap themselves around. Jobs lost to Free Trade is Trumps, bring the troops home is Trumps and security is Trumps.
Kevin2, I can’t help but be amazed that the person you described would push for ‘gun control’. I believe his efforts will backfire on him.
I seen it up north. The Trap/Skeet people had an attitude. The only good gun was the Over Under they own. They weren’t shooters they were essentially golfers with a shotgun. It’s possible that the guy was paid to be there. Florida has a lot of poor. The strategy may be to drive a wedge in gun owners, good gun (mine), bad gun (yours). It appears that this was either a fluke or that the narrative desired is that logical, clear thinking, NORMAL, gun owners agree with the civilian arms prohibitionists.
Backfire? Thats a given if he thinks (which is a stretch) that licking their boots will appease them. It was a given that the guy wan’t bright.
Kevin2, LOL. I can tell he’s not bright. Wonder how much money he was offered to do what he was doing? I’m sure gun owners are already divided to some degree over whether to go along with confiscation if/when it comes. I’m not confused and already know where I stand and it’s not about to change.
It’s possible that his motivation, misguided as it was, centered around the Las Vegas massacre. He brought it up as a justification and completely tuned out to the very unusual background of Paddock. He did not know the term “False Flag” and used the term set up scoffing at it as “crazy”. Then again he might be paid. Regardless he was atypical. He so fit the role of the phrase Lenin coined, “useful idiots” that he could be the centerfold of Communism Today magazine.
You should have drop kicked him and took off lol. (jk).
Isn’t it simply amazing that so many people cannot understand even basic English words like “infringe”? But then, the founding fathers *could* have used the phrase “Congress shall make no law that…” a lot more often and would have if only they’s known about the law-happy libtards of the future. I know that they could not have known because such idiocy would have been soundly condemned and rejected in their day. But… wouldn’t it be great to go back in time and show them what happens in the future via a couple of newsreel DVDs? Man, would that have opened their eyes to what was to come!
It’s not their ignorance of the Constitutional language; it’s their indifference to it.
At Prepper Website, check out “The 9MM VS. The .22 For Survival And Self-Defense: Which Is Better? VERY interesting article.
I’ve always thought the .22LR makes a GREAT survival round,the reason being that if you were on foot you could carry quite a few more than heavier high caliber ammo.
Good article. Thanks.
DR, ya good article. Of course the 9 is better for defense but the .22 is better for other things. I used to carry a .22 pistol with me when deer hunting to bag a grouse with for dinner at camp. I love .22’s and have a number of them. I traded my 9mm off and ended up with a .40 sw. I LOVE the .40! That sumbich does some damage and is easily manageable. I also love my 1911 but my out and about in the mountains gun is the .40 now. 15 round capacity will ensure you will drop your target/targets. So many choices for so many tasks…. If I could have 1 handgun it would be the .40. If I could have 1 rifle it would be my .243….
Genius, I agree that the 9 or anything else heavier is better for self-defense. In the article I felt like the author was selling the 22 a bit short on self-defense. If it’s the only thing you have it’s better than nothing. Granted it might take a few rounds to do so but you could still bring down a shitbag with a .22. Get shot with a .22 and see what kind of day you have afterwards. The .22 has so much velocity it’s been known to ricochet around inside the torso and damage organs, etc. I swear by the 9 for primary self-defense caliber but I’m keeping my .22s because of the other purposes they serve. My new Ruger Security 9 with a 15-round mag will definitely bring down some targets. .22s were used for assassinations in Vietnam. There’s supposedly been more people shot with a .22 than any other caliber out there.
Meh… talk, talk and more talk. First, the constant reference to “guns”, “firearms”, “weapons”, etc.is legal speak. The 2A only mentions ARMS. Anti-2A legislation doesn’t include ARMS in their texts as doing so would be a direct co tradiction to the 2A and thus ruled “unconstitutional”.
And secondly, the Constitution either allows what the government does… or is powerless to stop what the government does. Thus, it is worthless. Read some Lysander Spooner writings people. Geez…
“It is Just a piece of paper” GW Bush. Following the US Constitution is what separates patriots from traitors. Currently the US has far too many traitors. It is time for a re-balancing.
read vices are not crimes by spooner
It is the Abrahamic beliefs that have brought about all of this crap. We live in a Natural World and only Natural law is valid! All others are alien and poison to Mankind and The Earth!
I bet most of your comments go right over their heads.