A federal appeals court has determined the COVID-19 mRNA injections do not prevent the spread of the “disease” they are intended for. That means those crazy conspiracy theorists who warned that these shots were not vaccines from the beginning were correct.

COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines

In a lawsuit filed against a California school district for mandating the COVID-19 injections as “vaccines,” it was determined that they do not offer any protection from the virus, nor do they prevent transmission. Members of the ruling class have been telling us this for quite some time, and it’s definitely interesting that even the judicial side of the rulers’ system is now saying it too.

Pfizer Executive Admits COVID “Vaccines” Were Not About Preventing Transmission

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California had previously defended LAUSD’s jab mandate based on the 1905 Supreme Court decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts to allow states to mandate smallpox vaccinations. The problem, according to Ninth Circuit Judge R. Nelson, is that smallpox injections, in that case, were deemed to help stop the spread of smallpox, which is not the case for COVID-19 jabs, according to a report by Natural News. 

2 Million Americans Dead From COVID Vaccines & It All Started With The Department Of Defense

In this case, plaintiffs “have plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively ‘prevent the spread’ of COVID-19,” Judge Nelson wrote. “At this stage, we must accept Plaintiff’s allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true. And, because of this, Jacobson does not apply.”

Another argument successfully argued by plaintiffs is that mRNA injections do not even qualify as “vaccines” in the first place because they are a new technology. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) actually had to redefine what a “vaccine” is back in September 2021 from a product that “produce[s] immunity” to a “preparation” that supposedly “stimulate[s] the body’s immune response.”

“Their complaint’s crux is that the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ is not a vaccine,” Nelson said. “‘Traditional’ vaccines, Plaintiffs claim, should prevent transmission or provide immunity to those who get them. But the COVID-19 vaccine does neither.” -RT

The COVID “vaccines” have proven themselves to be everything but.